Legal Opinion
Hamilton ex rel. Ceasar v. Ceasar
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided August 6, 1991No. 1-90-2308PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman
Respondent Ricky Ceasar’s (Ceasar’s) jury demand in the underlying paternity suit was stricken because he failed to pay the statutory jury fee. Leave to appeal from this interlocutory order was granted pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308. (134 Ill. 2d R. 308.) The issue certified by the circuit court is:
“Whether a respondent in a parentage action, under the Illinois Parentage Act of 1984, as amended, who had been determined by the branch court judge to be indigent, within the meaning of the Act, and hence, appointment of the Public Defender to represent him because of his indigency [sic], may…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Little v. StreaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- People v. NichollsIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Frank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barzellone v. PresleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Tate v. Garfield Hts.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013