Roque v. Frederick
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Darrell Hickman, Justice.
This is a case concerning an illegitimate child and the legal rights that surround such a child. The specific question before us is whether the putative father of an illegitimate child has the right to a hearing in county court on his petition to have reasonable visitation with that child. We hold that he does have the right to such a hearing. Our decision is rendered in this case without regard to the effect of Acts 664 and 665 of 1981 which will, no doubt, be a determinative factor in any cases arising after their effective dates.1
There is no dispute over actual…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- X.T. v. M.M.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
- A. B. v. Arkansas Social ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Escobedo v. NickitaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Escobedo v. NickitaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Scoggins v. MedlockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011