Legal Opinion

Watson Cogeneration Co. v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 5, 2002No. B147752PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, Acting P. J.

In this case, we conclude it was proper for the Los Angeles County Assessor to consider the actual income stream resulting from an above-market price government-facilitated power purchase agreement in the property tax valuation of an independent power plant developed and operating under that agreement. For this reason, we affirm the judgment in favor of the County of Los Angeles (County).

Factual and Procedural Summary

Appellant is Watson Cogeneration Company, an independent power producer which owns and operates a cogeneration power facility located within Atlantic…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Roehm v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Michael Todd Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. County of Stanislaus v. County of Stanislaus Assessment Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Prudential Insurance of America v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Elk Hills Power v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Holland v. Assessment Appeals Board No. 1California Supreme Court · 2014
  3. SHC Half Moon Bay, LLC v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Auerbach v. Los Angeles County Assessment Appeals Board No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. UAH-Hydro Kennebec, L.P. v. Town of WinslowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API