Legal Opinion

Holland v. Assessment Appeals Board No. 1

California Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 2014No. S205876PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LIU, J.

In 1978, California voters adopted Proposition 13, which added

article XHI A to our state Constitution. This amendment limited the rate at which real property in this state may be taxed and the extent to which the assessed value of real property may be increased. As relevant here, real property may be taxed at no more than 1 percent of its “full cash value,” with “full cash value” defined to mean either the assessed value of that property in the 1975-1976 tax year or the property’s value at the time of a subsequent “change in ownership,” subject to an adjustment for inflation.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Merrill v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Horwich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Torres v. Parkhouse Tire Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Larkin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Winn v. Pioneer Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016
  3. People v. PenningtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Ashley Judd v. Harvey WeinsteinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. Building Industry Ass'n of the Bay Area v. City of San RamonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API