Ayers v. Maple Press Co. & Affiliated Companies
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KANE, District Judge.
Before the Court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. The motions have been fully briefed and are ripe for disposition. For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied and Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is granted.
I. Background
Plaintiff Margaret Ayers (“Plaintiff’) was an employee of Defendant Maple Press Company and Affiliated Companies (“Defendant”) and covered under Defendant’s Employee Benefit Plan (“the Plan”) when, on December 13, 1997, her truck left the roadway and struck a tree. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Burt N. Sempier v. Johnson & HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Abraham WELDON, Appellant, v. KRAFT, INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lankford v. Webco, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2008
- McDonough v. UFCW National Health and Welfare FundDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023