Legal Opinion

McDonough v. UFCW National Health and Welfare Fund

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 29, 2023No. 3:22-cv-01209Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MATTHEW W. MCDONOUGH, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-CV-01209 v. (MEHALCHICK, M.J.) UFCW NATIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, Defendant. MEMORANDUM Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by UFCW National Health and Welfare Fund (“Defendant”). (Doc. 17). On August 3, 2022, Plaintiff Matthew W. McDonough (“McDonough”) filed this action pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a) to recover benefits under an Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) regulated plan. (Doc. 1). The parties have consented to proceed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API