Legal Opinion

Kohn v. Jaymar-Ruby, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 1994No. A062699PublishedCited by 19 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANING, J.

Defendant/appellant Jaymar-Ruby, Incorporated, appeals a judgment entered pursuant to a settlement agreement with plaintiff/respondent Arthur Kohn in respondent’s action for wrongful termination. Appellant contends the trial court abused its discretion in entering judgment because the agreement was invalid and unenforceable. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

Respondent’s complaint alleged generally that his termination constituted a breach of his oral employment contract not to be terminated except for cause, and a violation of the age discrimination provisions (Gov.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Riley v. Bear Creek Planning CommitteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Pacific Grove-Asilomar Operating Corp. v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Gopal v. YoshikawaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Fiore v. AlvordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Richardson v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. May v. AndersonNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. OSUMI v. SuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Rose v. MavrakisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. Terry v. ConlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Williams v. SaundersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API