Legal Opinion

Mohawk Rubber Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 14, 1938No. 43409PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhaley, Judge

The plaintiff is suing to recover an admitted overpayment of income tax for the year 1928. The material facts are set out in the findings. The plaintiff alleges a timely claim for credit was filed for the year in question. It is only necessary to repeat the facts bearing upon this issue to show that the position of the plaintiff is untenable.

The stipulated facts show that plaintiff, with an affiliated corporation, duly filed consolidated income tax returns for 1926, 1921, and 1928. The entire tax shown on the return for 1928 was, by appropriate agreement of the parties, allocated to, assessed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States v. Garbutt Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. McEachern v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Andrews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hollie v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  2. American Light & Traction Co. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  3. Matter of Qual Krom South, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1990
  4. American Light & Traction Co. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  5. American Light & Traction Co. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API