Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Great-West Life Assur. Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided December 10, 1942No. Civ. No. 782PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, District Judge.
It would appear that all of the salient and controlling facts have been stipulated. The question presented to the court, therefore, is whether such agreed facts will sustain a finding that there was a delivery of the policy in question to the applicant and whether there was a payment of the first premium on the policy to the defend*87ant as the contract between the parties provided. The application for insurance was made by one Bertram Harlan Rogers. The plaintiff herein was designated as the beneficiary in the policy to be issued. The application contained the following…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bowen v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Sawyer v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Braman v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Allen v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Zemler v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commercial Ins. Co. of Newark v. BurnquistDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952
- Wanshura v. State Farm Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- New England Life Insurance v. SignorelloDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000