Legal Opinion

Meyers v. C. I. T. Corporation

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 12, 1945PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

In this action against the defendants as principal and surety, respectively, on a replevin bond, the court rendered judgment for the defendants to recover their costs, and the plaintiffs have appealed. The court’s finding, which is not subject to material correction, may be thus summarized: On September 1, 1938, Alphonso Criscuolo owed the C. I. T. Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, a combined balance of $1409.05 upon the purchase price of two automobiles, evidenced by notes secured by contracts of conditional sale of which it was the assignee for value. On September 6,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coit v. SistareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  2. Glazer v. RosoffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Morgan v. New York National Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  4. C. I. T. Corporation v. MeyersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  5. Walko v. WalkoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  2. TES FRANCHISING, LLC v. FeldmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. Lewis Truck & Trailer, Inc. v. JandreauConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  4. Silver v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. Crosswhite v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API