Legal Opinion

Coit v. Sistare

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 19, 1912PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Interpleader to determine to whom a fund now held by the plaintiff and claimed by each of the defendants shall be paid, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in New London County, Reed, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the defendant Mathilde Von Ellert Sistare, and appeal by the other defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

In 1904 Mathilde Von Ellert Sistare brought an action in the Superior Court against Horace Randall Sistare. On February 19th, 1907, judgment was rendered in her favor. The defendant took an appeal from that judgment to this court. On June 5th, 1907, this court rendered judgment reversing the judgment of the Superior Court, and pursuant to the mandate of this court the Superior Court, on June 21st, 1907, entered a judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff, on June 13th, 1907, by a writ of error from this court, took the case to the Supreme Court of the United States. In June, 1910, that court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morris v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1849
  2. Morgan v. New York National Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  3. Grosvenor v. GoldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
  4. Beardsley v. BeecherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
  5. Barber v. MorganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. TES FRANCHISING, LLC v. FeldmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. The Hartford Provision Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  4. Parker, Peebles & Knox v. El SaiehSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  5. Anderson v. StriblingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API