Legal Opinion
C. I. T. Corporation v. Meyers
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 28, 1942PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.
This is an action brought to replevy two automobiles, a Hudson sedan and a Hupmobile sedan, which had been sold by the Moody-Wilcox Motor Company, a partnership consisting of J. M. Moody and E. A. Wilcox, to Alfonso Criscuolo on conditional sale contracts, dated February 1, 1938, and March 10, 1938, respectively, which had been assigned to the plaintiff. The defendant O’Brien, a deputy sheriff, had attached the cars in a civil action in which the defendant Meyers was the plaintiff. The trial court found the issues for the defendants and adjudged that the property be returned to them. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCleave v. John J. Flanagan Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Standard Acceptance Corp. v. ConnorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- C. I. T. Corporation v. HungerfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- C. I. T. Corporation v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Town of Norwalk ex rel. Fawcett v. IrelandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Murphy v. DantowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Hurlbutt v. HathewaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Rhode Island Hospital National Bank v. LarsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Meyers v. C. I. T. CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- In re Roosevelt Lanes, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.