Legal Opinion
Puentes v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 2008No. D049800PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCONNELL, P. J.
Plaintiffs Julie and Kenneth Puentes 1 appeal a summary judgment for defendant Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. (Wells Fargo), entered after the trial court determined that as a matter of law they cannot maintain their claim under California’s unfair competition law (UCL) (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.). 2 As the predicate act for their UCL claim, the Puenteses contend Wells Fargo’s calculation of interest due under their home mortgage on prepayment during a partial year breached the terms of the promissory note. They also contend the court erred by finding the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Saunders v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Chern v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Gary Davis v. Hsbc Bank Nevada, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Durell v. Sharp HealthcareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Rosenfeld v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Arce v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Boschma v. Home Loan Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.