Legal Opinion

Philadelphia National Bank v. Lutherland, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 1981No. 896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants contend that the lower court erred in allowing appellee to pursue deficiency judgment proceedings because appellee’s petition to fix the value of the property sold was untimely. Because the action of the lower court was interlocutory and is nonappealable at this juncture, we do not reach the merits of appellants’ contentions and, instead, quash the appeal.

Sometime in 1977, appellee obtained a judgment of revival against Lutherland, Inc. On December 28, 1977, the Sheriff of Monroe County conducted an execution sale at which appellee purchased the premises of Lutherland, Inc. for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Piltzer v. Independence Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Ventura v. Skylark Motel, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Bellotti v. SpaederSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Robinson v. Pocono Futures, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re ManleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. DeWald v. PaulineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Noto v. NotoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API