Legal Opinion

Mueller v. Campbell

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 23, 1945No. 279PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEVIN, District Judge.

This is a patent suit wherein plaintiffs charge defendants with infringement of Hunt Patent No. 2,300,157.

Plaintiffs are George R. Hunt, of Akron, Ohio, the patentee, and Conrad B. Mueller, of Cleveland, Ohio, the exclusive licensee of the plaintiff Hunt, under the patent-in-suit. Plaintiff, Conrad B. Mueller, does business under the names of Mueller Metal Products Company and Greenbrier Company of Cleveland, Ohio.

The defendants are Harold C. Campbell, of Ashley, Ohio, manufacturer of defendants’ alleged infringing device; H. D. Thomas, doing business as The Thomas…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  2. Dalton Ezzell Petteway v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  3. Priebe & Sons Co. v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  4. Mueller v. CampbellDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1946
  5. Mueller v. WolfingerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API