Legal Opinion

State v. Stricklin

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 18, 1996No. 2CA-CR96-0164PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Following a jury trial, appellant was convicted of unlawful possession of a narcotic drug. On appeal he challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress a baggie of crack cocaine an officer found in appellant’s pocket. Because we find that the denial of the motion to suppress was clearly erroneous, we reverse. State v. Gerlaugh, 134 Ariz. 164, 654 P.2d 800 (1982).

We agree with appellant that, based on the evidence before the trial court, the police officer who stopped him did not have reasonable suspicion to justify a Terry 1 stop or the subsequent weapons pat-down search.…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. GerlaughArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. RogersArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. VasquezArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. Garcia-GarciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WymanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  2. State v. MagnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  3. In Re Ilono H.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. State v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. Bradley Ronsick v. American Kenda Rubber Industrial Company LimitedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API