State v. Magner
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SULT, Judge.
¶ 1 Daniel Magner (“defendant”) appeals from his convictions and sentences for possessing and transporting marijuana for sale. He asserts his convictions are founded upon evidence seized as a result of an illegal detention of his person. We agree and therefore reverse.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 On Tuesday, November 28, 1995, Department of Public Safety Officer Jeff Brownlee (“Brownlee”) stopped defendant on Interstate 40 east of Flagstaff for driving 71 m.p.h. in a 65 m.p.h. zone. During the stop, Brownlee made several observations of defendant and his vehicle. Based upon his training…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ferris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- State v. TeagleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State v. O'MEARAArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. O'MEARACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Beijer v. ADAMS EX REL. COUNTY OF COCONINOCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.