Legal Opinion
Hagberg v. City of Sioux Falls
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided March 12, 1968No. Civ. 67-68SPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
NICHOL, Chief Judge.
This case is now before this court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. According to the allegations of the complaint, the defendant, City of Sioux Falls, on or about the 17th day of May, 1965, contracted with one Duane W. Fanebust to construct certain sanitary sewer lines within the City. Further, it is alleged that sometime later Fanebust, pursuant to this contract, was “excavating a trench near the intersection of Russell Street and Garfield Avenue;” that on August 2, 1965, at this…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Van Arsdale v. HollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Winter v. . City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- International Harvester Co. v. SartainCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
- Biggins v. Oltmer Iron WorksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- Woolen v. Aerojet General CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Conover v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Phillip Hess v. Upper Mississippi Towing Corp. And Penlatex Barge Lines, Inc., Defendants- Fidelity & Casualty Co. Of New York, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Don M. Davis, as of the Estate of Ethlyn M. Davis, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Leo Parsons v. Amerada Hess Corporation v. B & M Service Company, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Sloan v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.