Legal Opinion

Canter v. Hardy

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 6, 2002No. 2:97-cv-76290PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING STATE POLICE AND RESEARCH NORTH, INC. DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The above-captioned Section 1983 action is presently before the Court on two Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants John Hardy, Frederick LaBarge, Douglas Wilt, Kenneth Bur and Carl Goe-man (the “State Police Defendants”) and Defendants Charles Rettstadt and Research North, Inc. (the “Research North Defendants”). Plaintiffs have responded to Defendants’ Motions to which Responses Defendants have replied. The Court has reviewed and considered…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. John Hamilton v. City of RomulusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. Beckett v. FordDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  3. Fitzpatrick v. City of Fort WayneDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
  4. Jeffrey Dewayne Clark; and Garr Keith Hardin v. Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government, Kentucky et al.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2026
  5. Kenya Huston v. Autokiniton, d/b/a Tower International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API