Legal Opinion

Jeffrey Dewayne Clark; and Garr Keith Hardin v. Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government, Kentucky et al.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided January 5, 2026No. 3:17-cv-00419Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-00419-GNS-CHL JEFFREY DEWAYNE CLARK; and GARR KEITH HARDIN PLAINTIFFS v. LOUISVILLE-JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO GOVERNMENT, KENTUCKY et al. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motions in Limine (DN 490, 493). The motions are ripe for adjudication. I. STANDARD OF REVIEW “A motion in limine is ‘any motion, whether made before or during trial, to exclude anticipated prejudicial evidence before the evidence is actually offered.’” Louzon v. Ford Motor…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Rehberg v. PaulkSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Sykes v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API