Legal Opinion

John Hamilton v. City of Romulus

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 12, 2010No. 09-2196UnpublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, District Judge.

The underlying matter is a civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(2) with pendant state-law claims. Plaintiffs/Appellants appeal grants of summary judgment to the Defendants/Appellees. For the reasons indicated below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

The Plaintiffs/Appellants are John Hamilton (“Hamilton”) individually and as Trustee of the John L. Hamilton Retained Annuity Trust, and Hamilton’s sons: John Hamilton, Jr., Jeremy Hamilton, and Michael Hamilton. Hamilton owns all of the stock of four (4) corporations,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Hartman v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Gutierrez v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  5. Johnson v. KarnesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Uduko v. CozzensDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
  2. Anderson v. COUNTY OF HAMILTONDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
  3. Allen v. ForrenDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
  4. Atkinson v. State Of OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
  5. Bergeron v. Oakland, County ofDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API