Choen v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Cass Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.
By plea in abatement, and by motion to-quash, the appellant has raised the question whether the indictment is defective, because not signed by the prosecuting attorney, but by one who signed as “ special prosecuting attorney,” the record not showing affirmatively the ajzpointment; of a special prosecuting attorney.
The law provides for the appointment by the judge of the-court of “ some person to prosecute,” if the prosecuting attorney fails to attend, and' the pez’son so appointed may well be designated as a special prosecuting attorney. R. S. 1881,, section 5865. And, by the use of the word…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Morrison v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Mountjoy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Hipes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by33 opinions
- Powers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Dull v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1962
- Perfect v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. BowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.