Finney v. Rose's Stores, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs presented evidence that Rose’s was aware that the treadmill was plugged in and that the signs indicating such had been removed from the treadmill. Further, plaintiffs presented evidence that Rose’s employees had witnessed other individuals falling off of the treadmill. However, a large number of these were children who would intentionally increase the treadmill speed to see if they could remain standing on the treadmill. Also, anytime that a Rose’s employee was aware that someone was testing the treadmill, the employee would warn the individual to be careful.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. Fiber Controls Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Pulley v. Rex HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Clark v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Wrenn v. Hillcrest Convalescent Home, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Bonestell v. North Topsail Shores Condominiums, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nicholson v. American Safety Utility Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996