Legal Opinion

King v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 22, 1922No. 7219PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Shackelford County of the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

Our Assistant Attorney General has moved to dismiss the appeal in this case because the recognizance on appeal is insufficient. An examination of same reveals the fact that it fails to name the offense for which conviction was had. In Gross v. State,83 Tex. Crim. 349, this was held fatal to the recognizance. The motion of the State is, therefore, granted and the appeal is ordered dismissed.

Dismissed.

ON MOTION TO REINSTATE…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ledesma v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
  2. Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Huff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. Perkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Shurbet v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API