Goss v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
The State, through its Assistant Attorney General, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground of want of jurisdiction because of the absence of a recognizance such as required by law. The form of the recognizance prescribed is set out in article 903, C.C.P. Among other things, it is required that it shall state that the appellant has been convicted, naming the offense. This is omitted in the recognizance found in the record, and under the decisions of this court it is rendered thereby fatally defective. Watson v. State, 62 Tex. Crim. 620; White v. State, 68 Tex.Crim. Rep., 151…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
3Cited by9 opinions
- Willoughby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Upton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Singleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Ex Parte CochrainCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.