Legal Opinion

Shurbet v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 3, 1933No. 15923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for aggravated assault; punishment, a fine of $25.

An inspection of the record shows that the statement of facts in this case is in question and answer form, which is forbidden by the terms of article 760, C. C. P., hence the state*51ment of facts cannot be considered. Choate v. State, 59 Texas Crim. Rep., 266; Huey v. State, 90 Texas Crim. Rep., 400; Johnson v. State, 91 Texas Crim. Rep., 441; King v. State, 95 Texas Crim. Rep., 93; Smith v. State, 100 Texas Crim. Rep., 234.

There are a number of bills of exception in the record, but in the absence of a statement of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Choate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Huey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stanley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Midkiff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. Neely v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. Stevens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API