Legal Opinion
UTE Indian Tribe v. Utah
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 17, 1985No. Nos. 81-1827, 81-1901PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion
ON REHEARING EN BANC
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.
The above entitled matter was considered by the court en banc on the motion for rehearing. The result was that the majority of the Judges decided that there should be reconsideration and a different result. It will be recalled that in the dissenting opinion which was written previously, this writer agreed with the position which has been taken by District Judge Jenkins (Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah, 521 F.Supp. 1072 (D.Utah 1981)), who generally ruled that the Uintah Reservation and its lands remain the property of the tribes that are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lone Wolf v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Solem v. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mattz v. ArnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. KneipSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Hagen v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- STATE ex rel. MATLOFF v. WALLACECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2021
- Navajo Tribe of Indians v. State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Murphy v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Company v. Kee Ike Yazzie, Roselyn D. John, Romero Brown, Lewis Calamity, Peter J. Korth, and David C. BruntCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.