Legal Opinion

Knox v. Dick

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1983No. 13411PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant Knox commenced this action against respondents Dick and Dobszewicz, and a third defendant Lyn Newman who is not a party to this appeal, alleging defamation and intentional infliction of mental distress. Respondents Dick and Dobszewicz moved to dismiss the complaint as it related to them, asserting that the alleged defamatory statements were privileged and that the statute of limitations barred recovery as to certain of the statements. The motion to dismiss was granted and the causes of action against respondents herein were dismissed with prejudice. Knox appealed.

The first…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Donovan Edward Ruby v. Secretary of the United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. Nicola Panichella v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, (Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc., a Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  3. Rainier's Dairies v. Raritan Valley Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  4. Charles Resnik v. La Paz Guest RanchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  5. Ascherman v. NatansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by26 opinions

  1. Rust v. Clark County School DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Pope v. MOTEL 6Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Kirschstein v. HaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. Holste v. Burlington Northern RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Sahara Gaming Corp. v. Culinary Workers Union Local 226Nevada Supreme Court · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API