Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Ariz. State Bd. of Pardons and Paroles
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1977No. H-365-3PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLOHAN, Justice.
The petitioner, Arlen Thomas, seeks relief by a writ of habeas corpus contending that he is illegally detained in the state prison. He contends that the respondents have improperly revoked his parole. ' The petitioner asks that he be released from prison and restored to the status of parole.
The respondents deny that the petitioner was in a parole status, and they contend that the petitioner was an inmate in a temp orary release status pursuant to A.R.S. § 31 233(B).
In the minutes of the Board of Pardons and Paroles for May 19, 1976, the following appears:
“Motions were made…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mileham v. Arizona Board of Pardons and ParolesArizona Supreme Court · 1974
- McGee v. Arizona State Board of Pardons and ParolesArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Sheppard v. State Ex Rel. EymanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
3Cited by15 opinions
- Brown v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Mellinger v. Idaho Department of CorrectionsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. StaaelCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
- Broadhead v. Arizona Board of Pardons & ParolesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- State v. ManningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.