Legal Opinion

Sheppard v. State Ex Rel. Eyman

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 8, 1972No. 2 CA-CIV 1125PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUCKER, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from an order entered in habeas corpus proceedings instituted by the appellant to obtain reinstatement to parole status. His parole had previously been revoked by the Parole Board and he resorted to habeas corpus to challenge the legality of the revocation. The thrust of his attack was directed to the procedural aspects of the revocation and to the validity of the conditions of parole.

The lower court agreed that appellant’s parole had been illegally revoked in that the revocation proceedings did not comport with due process. The court also decreed that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Hyser v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  3. In Re TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Johnson v. StuckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Hendrickson v. Pennsylvania State Board of ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mellinger v. Idaho Department of CorrectionsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Thomas v. Ariz. State Bd. of Pardons and ParolesArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. StaaelCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
  4. State v. HudsonArizona Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API