Legal Opinion
Mileham v. Arizona Board of Pardons and Paroles
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1974No. 11402PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Justice.
This Special Action in mandamus was brought to require the Arizona State Board of Pardons and Paroles to entertain, hear and decide applications for paroles by petitioners. We accepted jurisdiction pursuant to Art. 6, § 5, Constitution of Arizona, A.R.S.
Petitioners allege that they are inmates of the Arizona State Penitentiary at Florence, Arizona, who, while serving sentences on other crimes, were convicted for escape or attempt to escape from prison in violation of A.R.S. § 13-392; that all are eligible for consideration for parole on the convictions for which they were…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Lerner v. Smith, WardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Murray v. SwensonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- England v. Ally Ong HingArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. BurchettArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. HowlandArizona Supreme Court · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. HaasArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Cottonwood Development v. Foothills Area Coalition of Tucson, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Jackson v. Phoenixflight Productions, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Mileham v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.