Legal Opinion
Karl Isac Joel Rosen v. Lawson-Hemphill, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 21, 1976No. 76-1069PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFIN, Chief Judge.
Karl Isac Joel Rosen, the inventor, and AB-Iro, the co-owner of the patent in suit (hereinafter we will refer to the plaintiffs collectively as “Iro”), instituted this action to enjoin Lawson-Hemphill, Inc. (Lawson) from infringing U.S. Patent No. 3,648,939 (Rosen patent) and to obtain an accounting. The district court found that the Rosen patent was. valid and had been infringed, and it granted the requested relief, staying the questions of an accounting and of attorney fees pending appeal. 399 F.Supp. 532 (D.R.I.1975). Lawson now appeals, alleging that the district court…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- James Earle v. Robert BenoitCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Levinsky's, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Carlos Romero-Barcelo, Etc. v. Harold BrownCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Arbrook, Inc. And John J. Nappi v. American Hospital Supply Corporation, Tackmer Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Jamesbury Corporation v. Litton Industrial Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.