Cattin v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FEIKENS, Chief Judge.
This action is brought by two former employees (“plaintiffs”) of defendant General Motors Corporation (“GM”), who allege that GM wrongfully terminated their entitlement to early retirement benefits and improperly modified its offer of special recognition stock to them. Plaintiffs originally claimed that GM’s termination of early retirement benefits violated the vesting and nonforfeiture requirements in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1053(a) (1982), and constituted a breach of contract. After GM moved…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hansen v. White Farm Equipment Co. (In Re White Farm Equipment Co.)District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984
- Herman L. Finnell v. Cramet, Inc., Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- Holliday v. Xerox Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
3Cited by5 opinions
- Adcock v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1985
- Ewalt v. Mereen-Johnson MacHine Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Cattin v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1986
- Cattin v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
- Werner v. American Bakeries Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1986