Legal Opinion

Cattin v. General Motors Corp.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 28, 1985No. Civ. A. 84-8601PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

FEIKENS, Chief Judge.

This action is brought by two former employees (“plaintiffs”) of defendant General Motors Corporation (“GM”), who allege that GM wrongfully terminated their entitlement to early retirement benefits and improperly modified its offer of special recognition stock to them. Plaintiffs originally claimed that GM’s termination of early retirement benefits violated the vesting and nonforfeiture requirements in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1053(a) (1982), and constituted a breach of contract. After GM moved…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hansen v. White Farm Equipment Co. (In Re White Farm Equipment Co.)District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984
  2. Herman L. Finnell v. Cramet, Inc., Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  3. Holliday v. Xerox Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adcock v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1985
  2. Ewalt v. Mereen-Johnson MacHine Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Cattin v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1986
  4. Cattin v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
  5. Werner v. American Bakeries Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API