Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railroad v. Intermountain Farmers Ass'n

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1977No. 14635PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice.

This appeal arises out of an action brought to enforce an indemnity provision in a lease agreement. The matter was heard by the court, sitting without a jury, upon stipulated facts, and it found the legal issues in favor of plaintiff, hence the appeal by defendant.

The facts giving rise to the action are briefly stated as follows: Plaintiff’s employee, Richard V. Richins, a train conductor, was injured on the leased premises of defendant’s while an engine was being used to remove empty box cars from the premises. The train, in darkness, illuminated by its headlights, entered into…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Union Stock Yards Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Griffiths v. Henry Broderick, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway Co. v. Evans Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pickhover v. Smith's Management Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. Shell Oil Co. v. Brinkerhoff-Signal Drilling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Freund v. Utah Power & Light Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Russ v. Woodside Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1995
  5. CIG Exploration, Inc. v. HillDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API