Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway Co. v. Evans Construction Co.
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer
Curtis Barron, a switchman employed by the plaintiff, Chicago 8c Illinois Midland Railway Company, was injured in the course of switching operations on the premises of Pillsbury Mills, Inc., hereafter defendant. He asserted a claim against the plaintiff under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. The plaintiff settled the claim and then brought this action for indemnity. The trial judge found for the plaintiff, and entered judgment against the defendant in the sum of $10,168.14, the amount of the settlement. The appellate court affirmed, (47 Ill. App. 2d 373) and we granted leave to appeal.
Pri…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Union Stock Yards Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Gulf, Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. Arthur Dixon Transfer Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1951
- Moroni v. Intrusion-Prepakt, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1960
- Standard Oil Co. v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Skala v. LehonIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Skinner v. Reed-Prentice Division Package MacHinery Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Miller v. DeWittIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Buehler v. WhalenIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Reese v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
- Gertz v. CampbellIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.