Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railroad v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1965No. 10361PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Plaintiff, Union Pacific Railroad Company, seeks payment under an indemnity covenant from the defendant, El Paso Natural Gas Company, for damages which the plaintiff paid to one of defendant’s employees who was struck by the plaintiff’s train. Upon the basis of the pleadings, mutual responses to discovery procedures and documentary evidence, the district court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, from which plaintiff appeals.

The judgment is grounded on a determination that the language of the indemnity covenant upon which plaintiff relies does not require…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Griffiths v. Henry Broderick, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Basin Oil Co. v. Baash-Ross Tool Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Vinnell Co. v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. LaymanOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Otis Elevator Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. DCR INC. v. Peak Alarm Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Interwest Construction v. PalmerUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Pickhover v. Smith's Management Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  5. Titan Steel Corp. v. WaltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API