Legal Opinion

State v. Sandefer

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 5, 1995No. 32075-1-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, C. J.

Paul Scott Sandefer appeals his standard range sentence for child molestation contending the sentencing court improperly penalized his exercise of his right to a jury trial. The State contends Sandefer’s standard range sentence is not appealable. We review Sandefer’s sentencing to determine whether his constitutional rights were violated, find no error, and affirm.

Sandefer was convicted after a jury trial on one count of first degree child molestation. The State requested an exceptional sentence based on the particular vulnerability of the victim. Defense counsel objected to the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Jimmy Frank v. Frank Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. BetheaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. State v. MailWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In Re LewallenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. McNeairCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  2. State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. State Of Washington v. Marcus Deandre WillisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. State of Washington v. Lonnie Lee PrzespolewskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API