State v. Green
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Marlon Green appeals from his conviction for second degree murder. He argues the trial court’s failure specifically to instruct the jury that the state had to prove beyond a reasonable doubt he did not act in the heat of passion violated his constitutional rights, and was in violation of state law. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
FACTS
In February 1993, Marlon Green was at a house party with his mother and his friends Tim and Essence. Green, Tim and Essence were in the living room when the victim, Laramuin Byrd, walked by. The victim wore his hat at an aggressive…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
- State v. HussongCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007