Legal Opinion

VanHercke v. Eastvold

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 19, 1987No. C4-86-1360PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Paul VanHercke appeals from an order denying a motion for a new trial in a civil action for damages for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident. Appellant argues that the trial court abused its discretion in denying a change of venue; that the court abused its discretion in allowing a previously undisclosed witness to testify; that evidence of intoxication was improperly admitted; and that the jury instructions were prejudicially erroneous. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant was 17 years of age when he was injured in a two-car accident while driving east on Highway…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. DeZelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Gebhard v. NiedzwieckiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Moeller v. HauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. A. Gay Jenson Farms Co. v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Newmaster v. MahmoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. FGA, INC. v. GiglioNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Blatz v. Allina Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  3. John Louis Corrigan, Sr. v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  4. State of Minnesota v. Earvin Ainwin WrightCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API