VanHercke v. Eastvold
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Paul VanHercke appeals from an order denying a motion for a new trial in a civil action for damages for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident. Appellant argues that the trial court abused its discretion in denying a change of venue; that the court abused its discretion in allowing a previously undisclosed witness to testify; that evidence of intoxication was improperly admitted; and that the jury instructions were prejudicially erroneous. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant was 17 years of age when he was injured in a two-car accident while driving east on Highway…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. DeZelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Gebhard v. NiedzwieckiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Moeller v. HauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- A. Gay Jenson Farms Co. v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Newmaster v. MahmoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- FGA, INC. v. GiglioNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Blatz v. Allina Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- John Louis Corrigan, Sr. v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Earvin Ainwin WrightCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014