Garrett v. Levitz Furniture Corporation
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
Defendant objects to the jurisdiction in this Court for the reason Defendant is neither doing business in Oklahoma nor otherwise found in the state. Plaintiff contends Defendant is present and doing business in the state in the form of its alter ego, Levitz Furniture Company of Oklahoma, Inc.
If jurisdiction exists in this Court, it must be found in the authority of the pertinent Oklahoma statutes. Perkins v. Benguet Consol. Min. Co., 342 U.S. 437, 72 S.Ct. 413, 96 L.Ed. 485 (1952). Oklahoma has three statutory provisions which provide for jurisdiction for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
3Cited by12 opinions
- Luckett v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- George v. Strick Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Roc, Inc. v. Progress Drillers, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1979
- Hoster v. Monongahela Steel Corp.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1980
- Northwest Animal Hospital, Inc. v. EarnhardtDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.