Legal Opinion

Garrett v. Levitz Furniture Corporation

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided January 8, 1973No. 72-C-367PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

Defendant objects to the jurisdiction in this Court for the reason Defendant is neither doing business in Oklahoma nor otherwise found in the state. Plaintiff contends Defendant is present and doing business in the state in the form of its alter ego, Levitz Furniture Company of Oklahoma, Inc.

If jurisdiction exists in this Court, it must be found in the authority of the pertinent Oklahoma statutes. Perkins v. Benguet Consol. Min. Co., 342 U.S. 437, 72 S.Ct. 413, 96 L.Ed. 485 (1952). Oklahoma has three statutory provisions which provide for jurisdiction for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Luckett v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  2. George v. Strick Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  3. Roc, Inc. v. Progress Drillers, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1979
  4. Hoster v. Monongahela Steel Corp.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Northwest Animal Hospital, Inc. v. EarnhardtDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API