Legal Opinion
George v. Strick Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 26, 1974No. Nos. 73-1124, 73-1125PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
Charles George and Marilyn Synco appeal from orders of the trial court dismissing two related diversity tort actions against a nonresident defendant for lack of in personam jurisdiction due to insufficient service under 12 O.S. § 1701.01 et seq. (1965 Supp.). This legislation is derived from the Uniform Interstate and International Procedure Act and the full text is pertinent to an understanding of our question:1
§ 1701.01 “Person” defined As used in this Article, “person” includes an individual, his executor, administrator, or other personal representative, or a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Volkswagen Interamericana, S.A. v. Henry RohlsenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
- Crescent Corporation v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Hines v. ClendenningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Vemco Plating, Inc. v. Denver Fire Clay CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Giotis v. Apollo of the Ozarks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Daniel J. Hartwig Associates, Inc. v. Allan KannerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Friedman v. Bloomberg L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Timberlake v. SummersDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.