Legal Opinion

The Lands Council v. Powell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 24, 2005No. 03-35640PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

The opinion filed on August 13, 2004, and published at 379 F.3d 738, is AMENDED as follows:

The final sentence in the first paragraph in section III.B.2. states:

Because the Final Environmental Impact Statement must include cumulative effects discussion for “reasonably foreseeable projects,” 40 C.F.R. § 1508.7, we must determine whether these two potential projects are “reasonably foreseeable.”

The final sentence in the first paragraph in section III.B.2. is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following language:

Because the Final Environmental Impact…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. BlackwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Earth Island Institute v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Ranchers Cattlemen Action Legal Fund United Stock-Growers of America v. U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Environmental Protection Information Center v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Ecology Center v. CastanedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Siskiyou Regional Education Project v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API