Legal Opinion
Ecology Center v. Castaneda
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 22, 2009No. 07-35054PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on April 17, 2009, is amended as follows:
The second paragraph of subsection <E. Population Viability >, appearing at slip op. pages 4450-51, beginning <West first claims the minimum ... > and ending < ... at least 134 breeding pairs > is DE LETED and REPLACED with the following:
WildWest first claims the minimum viable population for the pileated woodpecker in the KNF is 554 breeding pairs, which represents forty percent of the 1384 pairs the KNF was historically able to support. However, as WildWest notes in its brief, the KNF was historically able to support a range of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ohio Forestry Assn., Inc. v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- The Lands Council v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. Natural Resources Defense CounCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Earth Island Institute v. CarltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Jim PenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- League of Wilderness Defenders/Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. ConnaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Native Ecosystems Council v. Leslie WeldonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.