Legal Opinion

Davis v. Stroud

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1942No. Civ. 12026PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRAY, J. pro tem.

Appeal by plaintiff Meredith B. Davis from a judgment for defendant entered after demurrer to the amended complaint, and appeal by Clarence Stroud Davis, an infant, from the order of the court denying his motion for the filing of a supplemental complaint. No brief was filed on this appeal upon behalf of respondent.

The history of the pleadings was as follows: A complaint was filed containing three counts. The first count was for support of the then unborn minor and confinement expenses for the plaintiff mother. It did not allege whether or not the plaintiff mother was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kyne v. KyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Carter v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Dazey v. DazeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Sweet v. HamilothorisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Gambetta v. GambettaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Barbara A. v. John G.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Schumm v. BergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API