Legal Opinion

Gambetta v. Gambetta

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 12, 1916No. Civ. No. 1635PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Marcel E. Cerf, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an action brought hy the plaintiff through his guardian ad litem to compel his father, the defendant, to support him, he being a minor child. The action is founded on section 196a of the Civil Code, which reads: “The father as well as the mother, of an illegitimate child must give him support and education suitable to his circumstances. A civil suit to enforce such obligations may be maintained in behalf of a minor illegitimate child, by his mother or guardian, and in such action the court shall have power to order and enforce performance thereof, the same as under sections 138, 139…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Estate of CahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Reed v. HaywardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Stevens v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Sweet v. HamilothorisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Davis v. StroudCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API