Legal Opinion
Muniz v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 5, 2013No. 11-17282PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge SINGLETON; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, JR. ■
OPINION
SINGLETON, Senior District Judge:
Kim Muniz sued her employer United Parcel Service, Inc., (“UPS”) in California State Superior Court for employment-related discrimination in violation of California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), California Government Code § 12900. Muniz made no federal claim. UPS removed the case to federal court on the basis of diversity of citizenship. The case was tried to a jury which returned a verdict in Muniz’s favor finding that UPS had discriminated…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Carl Curtis v. Irwin Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Norcia v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Robert Hodsdon v. Mars, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- David Tompkins v. 23andme, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Psm Holding Corp. v. National Farm Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.