Legal Opinion

Dillow v. Young

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1966No. 39821PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchneider, J.

We accepted jurisdiction of this appeal upon the suggestion that important questions of law could, and should, he determined involving the admissibility of that portion of hospital records containing (1) an expert opinion as to the external cause of injury, (2) a diagnosis by a fourth-year medical student serving as an extern, and (3) statements tending to show a physical condition pre-existing the inhalation of ‘ ‘ G-arb-0, ’ ’ which, it is claimed, aggravated that condition. The opinion of the Court of Appeals (3 Ohio App. 2d 110) and the three paragraphs of its syllabus are devoted wholly…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stanley Co. of America v. Hercules Powder Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. Quimby v. GreenhawkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  3. De Donato v. WellsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  4. Berndt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Mangione v. SneadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Swanton v. StringerOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Hytha v. SchwendemanOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Charles Teti v. The Firestone Tire and Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  4. McCormick v. Mirrored Image, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Lambert v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API