Legal Opinion

Charles Teti v. The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1968No. 17748_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, granting defendant-appellee’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence in the case. Jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship. Charles Teti, plaintiff, is a resident of Renovo, Pennsylvania, and The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, defendant, is incorporated under the laws of Ohio and has its principal place of business in Akron, Ohio. The parties will hereafter be referred to as plaintiff and defendant.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brandt v. Mansfield Rapid Transit, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Peabody v. Boston & Providence RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  3. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  4. Nelson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Dillow v. YoungOhio Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
  2. Helen S. Cardwell, Administratrix of the Estate of Winfred M. Cardwell, Deceased v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  3. Zora H. Gillham v. The Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  4. Weiner v. TrasattiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. Agnes R. Nutt v. Black Hills Stage Lines, Inc., a Corporation, Kenneth Clark and Robert MechaleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API