Hytha v. Schwendeman
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
This appeal presents a rather unusual stance of the parties involved, in that plaintiff Adesta Loretta Hytha, hereafter referred to as appellant, who had won a jury verdict in the Common Pleas Court of Franklin County, appeals to this court on the basis that the jury’s verdict was grossly inadequate, which, as stated by the appellant, indicated “a misunderstanding by the jury of the law and the evidence.”
Appellant also alleges that the trial court erred in allowing in certain hearsay evidence by way of cross-examination, such evidence being in the form of a physician’s medical report…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Weis v. WeisOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- Schneiderman v. SesansteinOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- Green v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- Schmitt v. Doehler Die Casting Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
- Lewis v. WoodlandOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- McQueen v. GoldeyOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Meyers v. Hot Bagels Factory, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Shumway v. State Teachers Retirement BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Babb v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987
- McCormick v. Mirrored Image, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.