Legal Opinion

Allen v. Pullen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 15, 1986No. 8618SC134PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred when it granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of plaintiff and Lowe’s, finding, as a matter of law, that defendant’s counterclaim and third party claim were barred by her contributory negligence. For the reasons which follow, we reverse.

A motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, made pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50(b), is a request that judgment be entered in accordance with the movant’s previous motion for a directed verdict, despite the contrary verdict of the jury. Summey v. Cauthen, 283 N.C.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Smith v. Fiber Controls Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Bryant v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Summey v. CauthenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Norwood v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Williams v. OdellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Smith v. PassCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Munie v. Tangle Oaks Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Meadows v. Cigar Supply Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Colvin v. BadgettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API